Thursday, August 4, 2022

do you use Amazon prime or delivery service for goods?

I'm going to start by saying I do use pill pack which is an Amazon pharmacy the reason is simple I never miss my medications and at 74 that's pretty important. However I need to choose wisely. Young people want things immediately Amazon prime then one of my things immediately use Amazon.

What you young people do not see to understand is that Amazon is a terrible employer. You would not last one day at an Amazon fulfillment center or Warehouse.

You would not last one week as an Amazon delivery driver. The working conditions are sometimes horrendous sometimes okay but always they are considered by most people atrocious.

Most young people I have met that includes men and women stays that they want their community to thrive that is a good philosophy. However using Amazon is not having your community thrive. Having your community thrive is using a mom and pop store that establish themselves five years ago in the city you live in. Shop those stores.

If you want better schools if you want better colleges if you want better fire departments and then shop locally.
.
The money spent at a local store 100% of that money not including taxes goes to the store the county and the City bolstering the ability for that entity to take care of the citizens.

Remember that when you use your phone or computer to create an order. Buy locally.

Sunday, July 31, 2022

NO, UNITED STATES WAS NOT FOUNDED ON EVANGELICAL OR CHRISTIAN PRINCIPLES.

Most of our founding fathers were deists that was not Christianity. Some of them were even Masons which is a direct threat to Christianity.

Some people in the Evangelical and Christian religions would see the sky is yellow as it were actually blue.

A little history lesson would be good about now. Go back to England and France and Henry VIII. France was a Catholic Nation England was a Catholic Nation but Henry the 8th would not be granted a divorce by the Roman Catholic Church therefore he took an across himself to move the goal posts so to speak.

Then you had the Jewish religion which was an outcast by all the others.

When Martin Luther nailed his thesis on the church door it created a schism.

During this time in Europe and England you had the Mennonites and other religions that were an offshoot of Martin Luther.

Where was one did you say if you were one religion and one day from being executed for that religion.

Well there was a country across the Atlantic with land and freedom with no religious interference.

If the founders were dogmatic about anything, it was the belief that a person’s faith should not be intruded upon by government and that religious doctrine should not be written into governance. James Madison, for instance, was vigorously opposed to religious intrusions into civil affairs. In 1785, when the Commonwealth of Virginia was considering passage of a bill “establishing a provision for Teachers of the Christian Religion,” Madison wrote his “Memorial and Remonstrance Against Religious Assessments,” in which he presented 15 reasons why government should not become involved in the support of any religion.
In his first term as president, Thomas Jefferson declared his firm belief in the separation of church and state in a letter to the Danbury, Conn. Baptists. He said: “Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between man and his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legislative powers of government reach actions only and not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should `make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,’ thus building a wall of separation between church and state.”

Notice what Thomas Jefferson said? Building a wall of separation between church and state.

Considering the Republicans of today are considering destroying that wall, the supreme Court is considering destroying that wall some of the states are considering destroying that wall. And yet the Republicans Evangelical Christians are trying to remove that wall destroy that wall that are founding fathers so thoughtfully put in place to protect all religions so that the governments of the people and for the people would continue unlike the problems that surface in Europe.

Let's say a word about our first President George Washington. Most people do not know that he was offered the appointment of King and declined it and said he would serve for only a short period of time and return to his farm. Yeah most of the Republicans and most of the Democrats hold on to this power and do not act like a responsible stewart of government.

And to all the Evangelical Christians and the far right who say that George Washington was a shining star to all Christians. Ask your pastor ask your Reverend what he thinks of being a mason of being a deist which is contrary to every Christian concept.
A treaty of peace and friendship between the United States and Tripoli that was approved by George Washington explicitly stated: “The government of the United States is not in any sense founded on the Christian religion…” This treaty was negotiated by the American diplomat Joel Barlow during the administration of George Washington. Washington read it and approved it, although it was not ratified by the senate until John Adams had become president.

Finally, and most obviously, if the founding fathers intended to include Jesus, the Bible, or other particular aspects of the Christian faith in the founding of our nation, they would have expressly done so. However, the two references to religion that are in the Constitution contain exclusionary language. The First Amendment says, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion. . .” and in Article VI, Section III, “… no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.”

No religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.”


As for Thomas Jefferson the man, he was a very complex individual living in an era where religion could get you killed.

Jefferson expressed his fervent belief in the importance of the separation of religion and government in many personal letters and official documents, but one of the most famous instances was in his letter to the Danbury Baptists. In this letter Jefferson quoted the First Amendment in his agreements with the Danbury Baptists that states should not have established governments and that all religion and government should be separate. Jefferson then goes on to say the famous line, “…..thus building a wall of separation between Church & State.”

Sounds familiar doesn't it?

Deism wasn’t a widely popular religion in 18th century America, but it did have a small, influential pool of followers. Deism began in Europe in the 17th century along with the Enlightenment. Deists of the 17th and 18th centuries often attempted to downplay the differences in their beliefs to traditional Christianity to keep debate from breaking out into a larger controversy.  While deism follows many of the beliefs of Christianity, it rejects the supernatural aspects. Deists believe in the moral teachings of Jesus Christ, but they do not believe that he was the son of God.

So what does this mean in 2022 and 2023? It means that our founding fathers were very wise. They saw the conflicts between France and england. They saw what happened when King the lionhearted went on a crusade to the holy lands and were slaughtered as were the caliphates.

Much has been said about the death and destruction that religion has brought about. It's not that the religion was evil it's that evil people subverted the religion.

This is exactly what Thomas jefferson, George Washington, and Madison were concerned about which is why Thomas Jefferson strenuously thought to keep church and state separate.

The evangelicals and Christians some have very good hearts they are trying their best to figure out what is happening in our country. But there are others who are subverting Evangelical and Christian religion to make a mockery of our founding fathers and the founding of the United States of America.







unintended consequences

When you're young woman and the young man all you can think of is go to bed and use the bed like a rabbit.

There are consequences to that however one of them is pregnancy. If you happen to live in one of the batshit crazy dumbass States that you are going to have a problem if the woman is going to have an ectopic pregnancy, miscarriage or any other kind of health risk because of the pregnancy.

Women who have just turned 18 men who have just turned 18 are considering snip snip. Women are having tubal ligations men are having vasectomies.

It doesn't take a genius mathematician with a degree in string theory to figure out there is going to soon be a problem.

What happens in 3 to 6 years? Oh yes we're a large country we have a large population but if 35% of men and women decide to have no children whatsoever what are the consequences?

One consequence is the volunteer army which is already having problems obtaining recruits. The second consequence is corporations who are trying desperately to find qualified people and the third consequence is who is going to teach those children or a better way to say it who cares
That shit crazy supreme Court made a very serious error. And the bat shit crazy people and those States are going to be met with some very serious complications.

Good luck with that.


LADIES, TAKE BACK WHAT IS YOURS

Ladies men have been using you, raping you, lying to you and ignoring you since the cavemen.

And now old white men, some who are balding and have teeny tiny penises and ball sacks that look like dried up prunes. Mitch McConnell and Ted Cruz come to mind. But there are others in the Republican party that meet that definition.

An ancient Rome ancient Greece there was about the same. However there is a play about to warring nations  I would not exactly take my 10-year-old to see it. it contains adult level comedy


Women and this is my own opinion, I think women's want to be truthful want to do the right thing but the one problem that stands in their way are stupid, that shit crazy, dumbass men.

Men who think the vulva is a car. Men who get Virginia confused with the vagina. Men who hear the word uterus either think someone is saying it's new to us or have no clue and respond "say what".

Is it any Wonder then that women have a love hate relationship with men.

Back to the play I was talking about. "Picture if you will..." We're happy or boyfriend or a guy you met is in your bedroom and he's puffed up like a strutting turkey and in your mind you're going oh my God.

But you know something he doesn't know. You and everybody else on your Instagram, Facebook, tweet and YouTube channel have hatched a plan for women in the United States.

Oh I'm sorry dear did you want to make love. I've got such a terrible headache tonight. And every night after that.

A few things will start happening within a few days the Republicans you know those that have the teeny cocks and ball sacks that are well not exactly beautiful we'll start to wonder what's happening.

Ladies remember you have the power.  Women can last without sexual law long long time. Men on the other hand not so much. You've heard of blue balls or there will be blue balls purple balls Violet balls and what other color blue there is.

So what is this for? Why would women in the United States want to do this. Number one they took your vagina number two they took your uterus number three they took your freedom away number four they threw you under the bus then the bus moved and they put their feet on your neck.

Now women are at risk for dying with ectopic pregnancy, miscarriage, girls as young as 10 years old being required to give birth even though their pelvis is not fully formed for childbirth.

Republicans love to talk about the LGBT community as a groomers. What does it say about the Republicans who insist that a 10-year-old girl be forced to give birth when her body is not even able to stand the pressure much less the psychological injury. The Republican party groomers of minor girls.

I would urge every woman to read about this play research then network with other women in your community.

Take back what is yours.

If you were a Jewish, Muslim or native American or a woman in the military it is even more important for you.

Unto all those bad shit crazy evangelicals who say it's against God's law there is not one mention of abortion in the Bible. It was practiced.

Ladies take back your power take it back yeah I know I'm a man but good grief what some of these men are doing things to high heavens.















Tuesday, July 26, 2022

Time For Pro Bono

I've been noticing that boycott Walgreens boycott CVS. There is another way to do this.

To the store and Sue the pharmacist in question for practicing medicine without a license. A piece of paper that the person brings in is a prescription written by a licensed physician.

Whatever I have visited a pharmacy such as CVS or Walgreens I never have seen MD after the name of the pharmacist.

To the store and soon the pharmacist. Jack them up until they pop like a pimple.

They're all crying it's because of my religion it's because of my religion. If you are unable to carry out your job then go to McDonald's and flip hamburgers.

But I am serious in this sue the pharmacist take his house his car his golf clubs and anything else that is tangibly to be able to be converted into Cash.

Now on the other side of this on the legislatures in other states such as Alabama Tennessee Texas ad finitum ad nauseam.

What to do what to do what to do? Well if they do not have a MD after their name or do after their name they are not doctors.

Sue the hell out of them each individual person who voted for these idiotic non-medical laws that put women into risk.

And don't be versatile with these idiots sue them over and over and over again as long as it takes make it personal because trust me two women it is personal.

Monday, July 25, 2022

what now?

 Are you kidding me.

What has happened to all the strong women in the United States?

It seems are all the strong women have disappeared they are willing to have white old Republican men who have very tiny penises and whose nut sacks look like shriveled up prunes throw them under the bus.

There was a time when women knew who they were and would not take any crap from anybody why has that changed?

I will admit that I am a man 74 years old and yes I've taken to bed about four women in my lifetime I've been married one time only and after my wife passed away I saw a change to start with the woman of the United States becoming weaker allowing the men to run over them.

Ladies they are coming after your uteruses and your vaginas and they won't be satisfied until they turn their state into a Gestapo state where you cannot travel you cannot use birth control you cannot have an abortion you cannot have an ectopic pregnancy you cannot have a miscarriage in other words you're toast.

I would like you women to Google search a Greek play where women withheld sex from two Waring armies to stop the bloodshed of the men.

I don't feel sorry for you I feel sad for you because you were one strong. I could not imagine myself birthing a bowling ball.

When I had my daughter correction when my wife had our daughter she took my hand and almost broke my wrist while at the same time screaming, YOU GOT ME INTO THIS YOU SON OF A BITCH.

Of course I knew that was a pain talking and I also knew what was true she was strong. And like all other women seen you her body better than anyone else.

Please ladies please step up to the plate and vote these idiots out of office.

Monday, November 12, 2018

Is It Time for Jedge Dred?

The United States and it's collective citizens have a problem, gangs. Drive by's, innocent children shot. Families in anguish. Which now begs the question, is it time for a Judge Dred. You know who I am talking about. Sylvester Stallone who played Judge Dred.  The film takes place in 2080 and depicts a dystopian world and the crime-ridden metropolis Mega-City. (more on the Judge Dred Movies here. The last sentence is from Wikipedea).

The reason I ask if it is time for a Judge Dred is that there seems nothing can be done to stop gangs like MS-13 or other gangs like them. Judge Dred was lawyer in charge of the defense (asking the defendant was guilty), prosecutor, judge and executioner, although most of the time the defendant ended up being guilty and the out come for the defendant was not good. 

Judge Dred carried out extra judicial executions sanctioned by the government in a lawless society trying to protect what little normalcy was left.  In the same way, perhaps it is time for a  Judiciary capable and authorized by Congress and sanctioned by the Supreme Court. 

In this scenario the United states would be broken into 6 districts; North Western Judicial, South Western Judicial.  Over the Rockies it would be Mid North Judicial, Mid South Judicial. Past the Mississippi it would be North Eastern Judicial and South Easter Judicial.

Once both  houses of congress agrees that a particular gang poses a 'CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER' to the United States and it's citizens, the Supreme Court reviews the CaPD and notifies congress if it does or not.  (this being the check and balance. taking into account the citizens killed by the gang. The FEDERAL MARSHAL'S OFFICE  will train and deputize 100 people per district and a special 'badge' will be created for those deputized officers.  The RICO EXECUTION WARRANT will then be sent to one of the six districts that requested the RICO EXECUTION WARRANT.

At any time the district can rescind the RICO EXECUTION WARRANT if the gang in question takes steps NOT to be a CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER to the united states.  Once the RICO EXECUTION WARRANT is issued 25 of the SPECIAL FEDERAL MARSHALS will be sent to carry out the RICO EXECUTION WARRANT on  the gang   The warrant will list the names of those on the RICO EXECUTION WARRANT.  

Once set in motion and the congress and supreme Court has reviewed the names and the district agrees there is no reprieve. Those listed on the RICO EXECUTION WARRANT will be met with extreme prejudice.

Do I think this will ever happen? Probably not. If it does and nothing changes will it happen?  Perhaps if everything stays the same the the citizens get fed up. That will take about 50 years or longer. .

Remember the gangster Al Capone? He was not taken down for murder he was taken down after the IRS looked over his finances.  We have a similar situation with the gangs though it is not exactly the same. Right now the RICO statute is used as a very effective tool a looking at the way the gangs are organzied.